[Tagging] Landuse vs Place - conversation at talk-key-landuse in wiki

Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhauser at gmail.com
Fri Feb 15 13:04:44 UTC 2013

I would disagree that place=neighbourhood implies landuse=residential: I
know of neighborhoods that are mostly industrial or commercial landuse.

On Friday, February 15, 2013, wrote:

> This is a posting on the wiki which I've responded to -->
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:landuse#Landuse.3D_-vs-_Place.3D
> The text of my input, for discussion:
> My opinion on this is that _place=neighborhood_ implies
> _landuse=residential_ but not vice versa. In that case, if one has
> information on a particular area having a name and a boundary which allows
> one to refer to it as a named place, then neighborhood would be preferred.
> For instance, a relation of _type=boundary_ and _border_type=subdivision_ I
> created at http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2674522 ;
> _place=neighborhood_ is on the label node, but it might just as well (maybe
> better) been put on the relation so that rendering like that via WIWOSM
> would show a boundary instead of a node. I'm glad to hear people's
> opposition to or support for this opinion. --Ceyockey (talk) 12:23, 15
> February 2013 (UTC)
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org <javascript:;>
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20130215/8ab28193/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list