[Tagging] Power proposals

[François Lacombe]

Good question.

It may be up to each mapper to make the distinction.
Myself I would definitely use operators distinguishing : If a whole big
plant is divided between two or more operators, I would map a separate area
for each operator.

Foremost, areas must reflect land occupation. If 2 different operators'
plants are contiguous in reality then areas must be contiguous too.

Do you have any example which can illustrate such situation in the wiki?


Cheers.

2013/3/14 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>

> Could you explain when we should map several adjacent plants, and when
> they would be considered one big power plant consisting of several
> parts? How can the distinction be made? Does the area have to be
> contiguous?
>
> cheers,
> Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>



-- 
*François Lacombe*

francois dot lacombe At telecom-bretagne dot eu
http://www.infos-reseaux.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20130314/694276ba/attachment.html>