[Tagging] Proposal - voting finished - man_made=lamp
frederik at remote.org
Mon Nov 25 08:06:24 UTC 2013
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 11/24/2013 09:45 AM, Manuel Hohmann wrote:
> In the two voting periods that this proposal has run through the
> following results have been obtained:
> - First voting period: 6 times yes. - Second voting period: 18
> times yes, 18 times no, 1 partial approve.
This means that by any traditional reading, the proposal has been
rejected, even though you seem to avoid the word.
> This result therefore suggests the following possibilities for
> proceeding with this proposal:
> - Those who voted against the proposal need to agree on how to
> change it such that it will become more acceptable.
I don't see why the onus should be on those who voted against the
proposal. I could also say that those who voted for the proposal need
to work on it to make it more acceptable.
> - Use the proposed features as they are.
Yes, anyone is free to use any features, proposed or not, rejected or not.
> For this reason the status has for now been reset to "proposed",
> until there is further progress.
That's a great idea, we simply get rid of the "rejected" status and
anything that is not accepted remains in "proposed" forever ;)
Of course this opens the question - what if someone wanted to propose
a *different* tagging of lamps, should they then overwrite the page
with their proposal or should we simply have a ton of proposals in
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Tagging