[Tagging] Usefulness of bicycle=dismount on ways

Richard Welty rwelty at averillpark.net
Mon Oct 7 16:23:20 UTC 2013


On 10/7/13 12:18 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> 2013/10/7 fly <lowflight66 at googlemail.com
> <mailto:lowflight66 at googlemail.com>>
>
>     You are allowed to push your bike on every footway/pedestrian plus
>     ways
>     with vehicle=no. E.g. it is useless. Either you are allowed to ride
>     (bicycle=yes/designated) or not (bicycle=no or vehicle=no)
>
>
>
>
> I agree that bicycle=dismount seems useless, at least as long as you
> only look at public ways in Germany (and probably in most countries),
> but there are a lot of places where you can walk but you cannot bring
> your bicycle, not even pushing. E.g. in shopping malls and on private
> squares there might be restrictions. Then again there might be further
> distinctions (e.g. "are you allowed to carry your bike"? What if it is
> foldable? ...)
>
>
it has implications for routing of bicycles. bicycle=no will mean that
it will never be used on a bicycle route. bicycle=dismount would indicate
that inclusion of the way on a bicycle route is reasonable.

richard

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20131007/dfdce3ea/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 946 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20131007/dfdce3ea/attachment-0001.pgp>


More information about the Tagging mailing list