[Tagging] tourism=guest_house or tourism=bed_and_breakfast ?
erringtona at gmail.com
Fri Oct 18 10:35:49 UTC 2013
On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 01:47:51 Dudley Ibbett wrote:
> From a tourists perspective it is quite important to know whether it is
> self catering accommodation or not. It is also important to know whether
> it is a single building unit (i.e. house,cottage,chalet) as opposed to a
> number of units in a building (i.e. apartments). I would be inclined to
> use tourism=apartments for the latter. Types of tourist accommodation do
> seem to be quite country specific. There are very few tourist apartments
> in the UK but they are very common in Croatia for example. I would agree
> that tourism=chalet would seem to be the most appropriate tag for a gîte.
Surely it's simply a matter of tagging "There is accommodation of some kind
here" and including a URL to the website? There is very little point in
slicing the data so thinly, especially since renderers will paint a little
picture that probably looks identical for any class of tourist accommodation.
With a website URL, the OSM map user can hop over to the hotel's site and read
all about the number of rooms and facilities.
What I really think would be nice is to specify an osm.xml file that a
business can put on its website. Inside OSM we would tag the place with a
URL for that file, and we copy a small set of basic tags taken from that
file, sufficient to render the object. Periodically we can automatically (or
semi-automatically) refresh the tags with the content of the file. (If there
is no file, or no URL we just tag manually as we do now). Then at runtime,
whenever someone seems interested in the place the mapping app uses the URL
to fetch the contents of the XML to display to the user. The advantage of
this is that it distributes the data, and allows the site owner to maintain
the details without filling OSM up with useless cruft. The XML file could
even be dynamic and contain current vacancies, prices, upcoming closures (for
More information about the Tagging