[Tagging] simple_brunnel : one node bridge like xing highway over waterway

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Thu Apr 3 09:12:51 UTC 2014


2014-04-03 1:53 GMT+02:00 Janko Mihelić <janjko at gmail.com>:

> Rationale in the Wiki says this would save us database space, we would
> have 2 ways and 1 node less per bridge. Also, that maintaining one node is
> easier than maintaining 3 ways. Lastly, problem of pretending you have
> drawn a little bridge precise, when you didn't.
>
> All of these are valid points,
>



FWIW, it is not true, we  would "save" 1 way or 2, but the amount of nodes
would remain the same, because with the new proposal the waterway would get
an extra node which it hasn't otherwise. The 1 way saved is on the other
hand loss of information as pointed out before.

cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140403/bf14422a/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list