[Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 63, Issue 83

Ulrich Lamm ulamm.brem at t-online.de
Sun Dec 28 20:43:40 UTC 2014

Am 28.12.2014 um 20:42 schrieb tagging-request at openstreetmap.org:

> Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 19:22:47 +0100
> From: Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at gmail.com>
> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
> 	<tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Crowded links between carriageway and
> 	cycletrack
> Message-ID:
> 	<CALDvra6wQnL2epdduNG9dbQev2OXvH21PMzro6FCrGeiiPqNjA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> It is better to map all existing connections between road and cycleway
> rather than add this tag
In areas with houses dwelt by one or two families, often there is such a traverse link every fifteen meters
> (too complicated, anyway it will be not supported by routers).
If this tag tells the router, ""please consider the adjacent carraigeway,too", why do you think, routers won't understand that. 
Routers also find a house next to the roadline.
> 2014-12-28 18:29 GMT+01:00 Ulrich Lamm <ulamm.brem at t-online.de>:
>> Hi mapping and cycling friends,
>> I have suggested an overall parameter for separately drawn cycletracks, to
>> record crowded links between roadside cycletrack and carriageway:
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Traverse_link

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20141228/28826b89/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list