[Tagging] correct access tagging for tourist attraction

[Greg Troxel]

johnw <johnw at mac.com> writes:

> perhaps use the =destination tag instead of =private on the road you are supposed to use. 
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access>

I agree.  There's also access=customers that I use for parking lots.
access=destination is supposed to be some legal notion in the UK.   In
the private facility case, it's really a question of some places being
signed for no access and some being welcoming, but it a
with-permission-of-landowner kind of way.

Another approach is to use access=no for the ones you shouldn't use (and
for which almost no one among the public gets permission) and

  access=permissive

for the one the public should use.  It's a little off; presumably going
there at night is not ok.  But as a
represent-the-world-with-what-we-have-now approach, it seems like a
pretty good fit.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 180 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20141231/1bae643f/attachment.sig>