[Tagging] one-directinal bicycle dismount on oneway road ?

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Sun Jan 19 16:13:59 UTC 2014


2014/1/19 Colin Smale <colin.smale at xs4all.nl>

> there are also footways (or whatever you want to call them) signed as "no
> cycles", which means that in these cases a dismounted cyclist is not
> equivalent to a pedestrian.
>
> If foot=yes (explicit or implied) implies bicycle=dismount which
> corresponds to "no cycling", I would suggest that bicycle=no would then
> mean "no cycles" i.e. not even if dismounted.
>

are these public ways? Is this backed by british legislation? Of course on
a private way you can invent all kind of arbitrary rules, like no women
with red hats, but on a public way?

cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140119/ce94b4f7/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list