[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - site=piste relations
yvecai
yvecai at gmail.com
Sun Mar 30 16:11:02 UTC 2014
On 03/30/2014 05:03 PM, fly wrote:
> Do not like piste as value, as it is easily misunderstood and you do
> include other features. Better use winter_resort or similar. fly
Hi Fly,
I can follow you on this, but personally I choose piste for the
following reasons:
1) semanticaly in line with the so-called 'Pistemaps' namespace
'piste:*=' and also with 'route=piste' routes.
At least within OSM we have something consistent, and somebody
willing to map winter sports will end up knowing what 'piste' means
for us.
2) ski/skiing is a bad choice, as resorts extends beyond ski
practice only
3) wintersports / winter_resort ... do it take a '-' , a '_' or
nothing? wintersport or with an -s?
I don't know if it's common practise, but feel free to copy-paste the
proposal with another value, and add a link in both for cross-voting.
Someone emailed me with 'site=winter_sports'.
Yves
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140330/5447a99d/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list