[Tagging] noexit=yes (again) (and again)

Andre Engels andreengels at gmail.com
Sat May 31 10:55:57 UTC 2014


What does the router have to do with the traffic sign? What information
does it get from it that can not be easier got from the topology?

André


On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Volker Schmidt <voschix at gmail.com> wrote:

> This is not so obvious, because it has to be directional (for the router).
> If you start your route in such a dead-end street you never get out, if
> it's not directional.
> The noexit=yes on the way to me seems much simpler and intuitive.
> (I used the tag initially in this way, when I started with OSM. I had no
> doubt about it's use in this way, until I came across some discussion in a
> mailing list)
>
>
> On 31 May 2014 12:04, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Am 31/mag/2014 um 10:06 schrieb Volker Schmidt <voschix at gmail.com>:
>>
>> But how do I tag a dead-end sign on a road
>> (e.g. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zeichen_357.svg).
>>
>>
>>
>> you'd tag it best on a node with traffic_sign=* (e.g. dead_end)
>>
>> cheers,
>> Martin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>


-- 
André Engels, andreengels at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140531/a6b74bcb/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list