[Tagging] sub key for cycle ways
imagic.osm at gmail.com
Tue Nov 4 08:03:00 UTC 2014
2014-11-03 18:47 GMT+01:00 Hubert <sg.forum at gmx.de>:
> But the question is, whether we should abandon cycleway=* tagging on the
> main road in favor for, let us say, cycleway:lanes=, or do we allow lane
> tagging in addition to the well established cycleway=* scheme.
As I wrote the :lanes proposal I'm obviously in favour of using it whenever
it is useful. And useful for me means: whenever there is not a simpler
tagging variant. If there is a simple road, two lanes, one in each
direction and on both side there's a cycle lane, then there is definitively
no need at all for any :lanes tagging. On the other hand, if we are looking
at junctions with multiple (turning) lanes and multiple cycle lanes, then
we should use the :lanes tagging in addition(!) to the good old cycleway
In general I would like to see the :lanes tagging used to provide more
details and not to replace established tagging.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging