[Tagging] natural=ridge vs natural=arete

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Wed Nov 5 11:28:14 UTC 2014

2014-11-05 12:23 GMT+01:00 Richard Z. <ricoz.osm at gmail.com>:

> after two years in the wiki where it was marked as approved and active it
> would not appear as a great idea to declare the vote for invalid based on
> nitpicking formalities, how many votes were missing for approval?

it was 50% missing (5 people)

Another reason I don't like current arete/ridge state is that some ridges
> are
> very long - and they may be partially arete and ridge in different
> segments.

you can split them ;-)

Having a way that is tagged partially as natural=ridge and partially as
> natural=arete seems like a bad idea.

it won't be a "way", it will be several ways.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20141105/c568147d/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list