[Tagging] Tagging of pitches within a campsite

David Bannon dbannon at internode.on.net
Tue Apr 21 22:53:29 UTC 2015


On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 14:45 -0700, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
>...

> The fact that rendering on osm-carto is so far behind tagging is an
> issue.
> 
Indeed.

> But treating the campsite like a building, and the pitches like
> apartments, makes a lot of logical sense.

I don't see any theoretical issue with calling a caravan park a building
from a routing point of view. Wonder if it might give a misleading
result on a rendered map that shows buildings .... 
> 
> And it scales well to how much is known:

Bryce, what does osm-carto do with your example below ?  As you noted in
another message, addr:housenumber, while wrong, gives some very positive
feedback, silly to ignore that fact. 

I see a similar problem with some retirement villages, market stalls,
car parks.....

David
> 
> 
> 0) leisure=camp_site,  drinking_water=no    (nothing is known about
> pitches)
> 1) capacity=100                                             (we know
> there are 100 pitches, but not where they are)
> 
> 2) addr:unit=1-50  addr:interpolation=all       (we know pitches 1-50
> along this road or area, but not exactly where)
> 3) addr:interpolation=odd addr:unit=1-49    (tagging one side of a
> road)
> 4) addr:unit=1                                               (here's
> the center or entrance of pitch #1).
> 5) relation=site  addr:unit=1 contains bench/parking/sewer dump/picnic
> table/gopher hole/tree/blades of grass  (micro mapping extraordinaire)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging





More information about the Tagging mailing list