[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Husainiya
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Mon Aug 24 00:12:13 UTC 2015
sent from a phone
> Am 22.08.2015 um 02:37 schrieb John Willis <johnw at mac.com>:
> We already define the religious buildings themselves through building=* and the POW through amenity, and the religion and denomination through their respective tags.
if those religious buildings have defined specific functions these should get a dedicated tag besides the building tag. Building =* is a tag about the building itself, not the use/function of it.
> Landuse=religious generically says "this is land used by a religious facility".
should the vatican museums get the landuse =religious tag? Saint Peter's square? Castel Gandolfo? How can I tell whether an amenity nearby a POW and owned+operated by the church belongs to the POW, and when does the POW belong to the amenity without them being landuse=religious? Like you wrote, in certain contexts it will be normal to have "holy places" like chapels and shrines associated with other things.
More information about the Tagging