[Tagging] RFC - tag: office=adoption_agency

[Dominic Coletti]

>
> Better might be: nodes (the node should be placed in the centre of the
> area occupied by the adoption agency)
>
​Better might be: "Definition: A place where prospective parent/s may adopt
> a child or children"
>
​​
 Both fixed.​


[image: CAP Banner]




*C/TSgt Dominic Coletti, CAP*Cadet Public Affairs NCOIC, Raleigh-Wake
Composite Sqdn.

U.S. Air Force Auxiliary

gocivilairpatrol.com <http://www.gocivilairpatrol.com/>

<https://www.facebook.com/pages/Civil-Air-Patrol/107647995924164>
<http://instagram.com/civil__air__patrol>
<https://twitter.com/civilairpatrol>
<https://www.flickr.com/photos/civilairpatrol/sets/>

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 1/12/2015 12:05 PM, Dominic Coletti wrote:
>
> I appreciate the feedback and was able to check out the Taginfo. One
> solution I saw was shop=charity. One thing that could be used is
> shop=charity and type=adoption_agency or something similar. The problem of
> the office (or shop) tag describing the whole building would be tagging a
> node on the building, along with nodes representing other offices or what
> have you within the building.
>
> Thanks for all of your feedback.
>
>
> shop=charity is not what you want! Please read the wiki?
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcharity
>
> It says "selling a mixture of second hand goods, donated by the public. eg
> books, clothing, toys, furniture. May also sell some new products, eg
> confectionery, crafts."
>
> --------------------------------------
> +1 for the intention of the tag.
>
> -------------------------------------
> Trivial nit picking - this is not a rejection. Nor a compliant. Unlike
> some I would not reject a proposal due to the wording!
>
> "*Definition: A way to tag places where prospective parents can adopt
> children"*
>
> This should be the definition of what you want to tag...
>
> Better might be: "Definition: A place where prospective parent/s may adopt
> a child or children"
>
> And
> "*Applies to*
>
> *The proposed tag **office
> <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office>=adoption_agency
> <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:office%3Dadoption_agency&action=edit&redlink=1>**
> would be used on either: *
>
>    -
> * nodes (in which case the node should be placed near the middle of the
>    building in which the adoption agency is contained) *
>
> This assumes that the adoption agency occupies the whole thing. If the
> adoption agency only occupies a section of the building?
>
> Better might be: nodes (the node should be placed in the centre of the
> area occupied by the adoption agency)
>
> ============================================== children vs adult
> I think an 'adult' cannot be 'adopted' - they are legally independent -
> not subject to guardianship by parenting.  Again this is just a note - for
> information and consideration by those concerned.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20151201/adb27962/attachment.html>