[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Reception Desk
osm at tobias-knerr.de
Fri Feb 6 15:37:20 UTC 2015
On 06.02.2015 12:16, Dan S wrote:
> However it occurs to me that it would be useful to have some way of
> indicating _what_ it is the reception for. For example, if it was part
> of a "site" relation*, then a role like role=reception would connect
> it to the larger entity in a meaningful way. That might be a suggested
> tagging option...
I believe this is not necessary as long as the reception is contained in
only one outline of a relevant feature (hotel, motel etc.), which will
cover almost all cases. Of course, for the special cases you could use a
relation, but that should be limited to those cases.
What I consider a bit odd, by the way, is the amenity key. Receptions
are usually not amenities by themselves, but instead part of an amenity.
Perhaps a new key for this kind of sub-feature would be in order?
More information about the Tagging