[Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 65, Issue 47

Lukas Schaus jan.l.schaus at campus.tu-berlin.de
Tue Feb 10 11:00:26 UTC 2015

i am sorry i must have missed your comment where you mentioned it  
before. I am not this experienced in OSM, but i don't see the  
potential for confusion since this is a relation. Maybe you can  
elaborate why this could be a problem since i am not aware. The name  
does maybe not match to 100% the purpose but the relation is more than  
just about the phases. Another major benefit is, to get information of  
the scope of the intersection and all possible connections between the  
incoming and outgoing edges in complex intersections as well as the  
relation between lanes and traffic signals.

Since I don't have a name that fits better, suggestions are welcome.  
BTW: How would I proceed if i wanted to change the name during vote?

> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 20:38:32 +0000
> From: Lukas Sommer <sommerluk at gmail.com>
> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
> 	<tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - traffic_signals
> 	(Lukas	Schaus)
> Message-ID:
> 	<CAFTrL-19Q8sOheL3Nqh5P3izAHSyGf95qbcfQoUnp2dROmfRdg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> I know that I’m a little late with this comment – I missed this while
> reading the proposal. Sorry.
> Maybe that’s something that can be changed in the prososal – if
> current voters agree?
> 2015-02-09 17:29 GMT, Lukas Sommer <sommerluk at gmail.com>:
>> I would strongly recommend to not use type=traffic_signals because we

More information about the Tagging mailing list