[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - key:rubbish=
John F. Eldredge
john at jfeldredge.com
Tue Feb 17 17:14:44 UTC 2015
On February 17, 2015 6:23:00 AM CST, Jan van Bekkum <jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com> wrote:
> What other uses exist in practice in addition to
> *waste=chemical_toilet? *
> For camping we have run into two cases I would like to have covered:
> 1. Disposal of chemical toilet contents: a place where you carry a
> to empty and clean it
> 2. A sink in the street: you drive your RV over it to empty waste
> tanks that are fixed in the car
> Or do you also want to cover split collection of glass, plastic,
> material, etc.?
> Jan van Bekkum
> On Tue Feb 17 2015 at 12:16:29 PM Dave Swarthout
> <daveswarthout at gmail.com>
> > I'm lurking but you know where I stand on this tag.
> > +1 for amenity=dump_station
> > Cheers,
> > Dave
> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:50 PM, David Bannon
> <dbannon at internode.on.net>
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 21:34 -0800, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> >> ....
> >> > The real question is what type of tag would attract rendering
> >> > support. amenity=dump_station is easier to deal with,
> >> > as it's a single level that maps to the commonly understood
> >> > of a place to dump a sewage holding tank.
> >> Bryce, I agree, my own interest here is I'm heading out on a trip,
> in an
> >> RV, in a couple of months. I'd like to map these things, need to
> >> where they are.
> >> My particular interest here is camping and emptying my holding
> tank, but
> >> there is a huge list of other people who have some other pet need.
> >> understand the community is (reportedly) reluctant to cater to each
> >> those needs individually with yet another amenity tag.
> >> Maybe I am wrong, lets see who stands up ?
> >> > There is a common icon:
> >> >
> >> > 20dump.png
> >> >
> >> Truth is, we'll need a lot of use before the rendering people can
> >> > amenity=waste_disposal + waste=chemical_toilet
> >> > is a nested tag, and far less clear. Someone searching for a
> >> > for this might not find it. And it's not entirely
> >> > clear exactly what the waste is (the toilet or the contents of
> >> > toilet)?
> >> Not sure I agree. If we document it properly, its searchable and
> >> easy to tag. And we say "amenity=waste_disposal and the waste is
> >> Agree I'd prefer a high level tag but its not bad like that,
> >> David
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Tagging mailing list
> >> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> > --
> > Dave Swarthout
> > Homer, Alaska
> > Chiang Mai, Thailand
> > Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tagging mailing list
> > Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
It would also be good to have a tag for a site accepting household toxic wastes such as used batteries, cleaning chemicals, leftover paint, and the like. Here in Nashville, Tennessee, USA, such substances are not supposed to included in the regular garbage pickup, or flushed down a drain. Instead, there is a single facility for the whole city, where such toxic products are supposed to be brought by the consumer (given the inconvenience, and the fact that you have to pay a $5.00 per visit "tipping fee", I suspect that most of this ends up in the regular garbage collection anyway).
John F. Eldredge -- john at jfeldredge.com
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that." -- Martin Luther King, Jr.
More information about the Tagging