[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - historic=tree_shrine

[Mateusz Konieczny]

I would dispute "Just because the node is tagged as *wayside_shrine* in
combination
with *natural=tree* does not mean that there has to be a tree shrine (could
also be a
regular wayside_shrine and a tree which are too close together to tag them
effectively as two different nodes)."

It is always possible to map close objects as a separate nodes (at least -
in a
decent editors).


2015-01-03 6:17 GMT+01:00 <wiki_openstreetmap_org.5.kuru at spamgourmet.com>:

> I started this tag back in Aug. 2012 to have a more detailed tag for tree
> shrines which I often saw and still see on commercial maps.
> This is my second time I start this RFC since I ran out of free time to
> care about it the first time and it got stuck.
> There already was wayside_shrine and wayside_cross at that time so the
> idea was to get a little bit more depth into the shrine type.
>
> Everything I could think of can be found on the proposal page including
> importance, name, rendering, tagging and disputes so I will not rewrite the
> whole page in this mail.
> I know that the page may is a little bit longer, but I hope that you will
> read it and have some constructive criticism for me/the tag.
>
> Anything that would be changed while this proposal is running will be
> noted in an updates section on the proposal page.
>
> The proposal can be found on: https://wiki.openstreetmap.
> org/wiki/Proposed_features/tree_shrine
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150103/12a4b4d0/attachment-0003.html>