[Tagging] Change of rendering: place of worship and, terminal without building tag

[John F. Eldredge]

The situation in India could mean that a congregation was meeting on that 
site, and planned to construct a building there, but had not yet done so.

-- 
John F. Eldredge -- john at jfeldredge.com
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot 
drive out hate; only love can do that." -- Martin Luther King, Jr.



On January 3, 2015 5:03:10 AM Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 3/01/2015 4:56 PM, tagging-request at openstreetmap.org wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 04:45:24 +0100
> > From: Andreas Goss<andig88 at t-online.de>
> > To:tagging at openstreetmap.org
> > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Change of rendering: place of worship and
> > 	terminal without building tag
> > Message-ID:<m87okr$iep$1 at ger.gmane.org>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> >
> >> >landuse=religious
> > Which still nobody knows what it is supposed to be used for...
>
> I too don't know what it is to be used for. However Australian
> Aborigines have 'sacred sites' that could be tagged that way. Ayres Rock
> springs to mind. One scrared site was vandalised... the road that goes
> past it has been closed for at least 30 years. So the sites are
> important, but they may not want the public to know their location due
> to the possible vandalism. I've come across a site in India that was
> tagged for a church IIRC .. but no building was present.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging