[Tagging] service=rural (Was Rural Alley?)

Andrew Errington erringtona at gmail.com
Mon Jul 13 01:24:37 UTC 2015


I think Javbw and I are in agreement, but I don't think a subtag is
required.  Just highway=service (and no service=* tag).

Andrew

On 13 July 2015 at 10:22, Andrew Errington <erringtona at gmail.com> wrote:

> This is the same in Korea.  Tagging the roads based on their physical
> characteristics (such as roadsign type, and with or without centre lines)
> is an excellent way to avoid subjective judgements.  Roads that go
> somewhere, but have no painted line, are unclassified.  These roads we are
> talking about in Japan (and Korea) are not highway=unclassified, and they
> are definitely not tracks.
>
> Andrew
>
> On 13 July 2015 at 08:08, John Willis <johnw at mac.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > On Jul 12, 2015, at 10:34 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <
>> dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Maybe you have to raise your current unclassified roads to tertiary to
>> make room for these roads in question?
>>
>> Japan tagging rules (on the wiki) states only roads with a painted center
>> line can be tagged tertiary. Japan has a more rigid and administrative
>> definitions for all roads tertiary and up.
>>
>> PS : where are alleys in your statement? They are clearly under
>> unclassified.
>>
>> Javbw
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150713/e37b3d18/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list