[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (traffic signals group)
sommerluk at gmail.com
Thu Mar 5 12:48:39 UTC 2015
Okay. I’ve made some clarifications to the proposal (avoid confusion
with coordination of traffic signals along a length of road …).
The remaining problem is the tag value “type=traffic_signals_group”. I
agree that “group” is not the best choise. We could maybe switch to
“type=traffic_signals_set”. (I would avoid “intersection_set” because
the relation isn’t restricted to intersections, but could theretically
also be used for pedestrian crossings on straight road; probably there
is not so much need, but I don’t wont to exclude this use case.)
So our choise could be “type=traffic_signals_set”?
2015-02-26 6:28 GMT, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com>:
> Looks like this has already been discussed .. in 2008 to 2011.
> No outcome for that ..
> Past discussion looks to have pointed to a relation ... the relation
> contains each node of traffic_light and can have a name= tag.
> I use 'set' because that is how they are called here in Australasia ..
> and it looks to be used in the UK too ...
> On 26/02/2015 4:55 PM, John Willis wrote:
>> If group is not a good word, then "set" is a good alternative.
>> On Feb 26, 2015, at 8:33 AM, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com
>> <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> This could be confused with the coordination of traffic signals along
>>> a length of road or even a district wide coordination of traffic
>>> light signals.
>>> I think it needs some words that restrict it to a single intersection?
>>> And possibly some thought to where a length of road (many
>>> intersections) or a district wide coordination of traffic signals
>>> occurs? If the name 'traffic signals group' is taken what name would
>>> you give this? May be a different name for this 'group'? Such as ?
>>> traffic signals set?
>>> On 26/02/2015 8:59 AM, Lukas Sommer wrote:
>>>> This is a request for comments for the proposal
>>>> The original author is Sanderd17. With the consent of him, I did some
>>>> supplementing. Thanks to Sanerd17!
>>>> Unlike the proposal “Proposed features/Traffic Signals” of Lukas
>>>> Schaus, this is _not_ about traffic light circuits, but just about
>>>> grouping together all nodes with highway=traffic_signals that belong
>>>> to a traffic signal system at one place. This could be useful in
>>>> Japan, where traffic signal systems have namen. (Thanks to nyampire
>>>> and javbw for suggestions and comments.) This could be useful for
>>>> routing/turn-to-turn navigation engines to calculate better the time
>>>> penalty for the traffic signal system.
>>>> Best regards
>>>> Tagging mailing list
>>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>> Tagging mailing list
>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
More information about the Tagging