[Tagging] Smoothness possible values, straw poll.

Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com
Sat Mar 14 06:10:00 UTC 2015


Combination of 2 and 3.

It must be possible to distinguish between vehicles. As I wrote earlier a
stretch of road that is reasonable for a 4WD can be horrible for a
motorcycle and vice versa.

A scale in words very bad, bad, ... very good or whatever at least helps me
to remember what the "good end of the scale" is. The first time I will have
to look in the wiki to get a feeling about the boundaries between the
levels, after that I should be able to do without.

On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 6:44 AM Ineiev <ineiev at gnu.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 02:00:51PM +1100, David wrote:
> > Been a good discussion on new tags for smoothness=.  Time, imho, to
> > ask people to indicate just what they do like. How about a show of
> > hands for one or more of -
> >
> > 1.  Numeric tags, perhaps grade1 .. grade8 similar to tracktype.
> >
> > 2. Words that describe the smoothness -
> >      glassy -smooth -rough -bumpy - rutted ....
> >
> > 3. Words that describe the (wheeled) vehicle that might use it -
> >      Any_vehicle, city_car_bike, 4x4_mtb, off_road_vehicle,
> extreme_vehicle, none.
>
> 4. Combined: grade1 ... grade8 glassy smooth ... any_vehicle ...
> extreme_vehicle and "grade1;glassy;any_vehicle" (or surface_grade=1
> roughness=glassy approved_for=any_vehicle).
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150314/faff6b0e/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list