[Tagging] Accepted or rejected?

David Bannon dbannon at internode.on.net
Thu Mar 19 11:20:33 UTC 2015


OK, is it fair to say any non specific vote, one that is neither a clear
yes nor a clear no is 'informal', not counted. Such a vote was cast with
the intention of it adding to neither yes nor no so we should observe
the voter's wish. 

Note their opinion but not count an uncountable vote ?

David

 

On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 12:00 +0100, Kotya Karapetyan wrote:
> I didn't mean to break the rules :) I thought I did count 8 +1's, plus
> the discussion shifted to other topics, so no strong opposition was
> expressed. 
> If Pieren and you really see more harm than improvement in what I've
> done, please feel free to roll back.
> 
> 
> I have a general impression that democracy should sometimes be a
> little helped by a strong opinion, when it minimizes damage. If you
> foresee a damage—feel free to undo.
> 
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>         
>         2015-03-19 11:37 GMT+01:00 Kotya Karapetyan
>         <kotya.lists at gmail.com>:
>                 Dear all,
>                 
>                 
>                 We have enough support to change the current math and
>                 no dramatic opposition. 
>                 I will do it in the wiki now. 
>         
>         
>         FWIW, I didn't even count 8 positive votes that you said would
>         be required when cast unanimously, but at least one clear
>         opposition (Pieren) plus my comment that you couldn't change
>         the rules this way.
>         
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         Tagging mailing list
>         Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>         https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>         
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging





More information about the Tagging mailing list