[Tagging] Accepted or rejected?
David Bannon
dbannon at internode.on.net
Thu Mar 19 11:20:33 UTC 2015
OK, is it fair to say any non specific vote, one that is neither a clear
yes nor a clear no is 'informal', not counted. Such a vote was cast with
the intention of it adding to neither yes nor no so we should observe
the voter's wish.
Note their opinion but not count an uncountable vote ?
David
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 12:00 +0100, Kotya Karapetyan wrote:
> I didn't mean to break the rules :) I thought I did count 8 +1's, plus
> the discussion shifted to other topics, so no strong opposition was
> expressed.
> If Pieren and you really see more harm than improvement in what I've
> done, please feel free to roll back.
>
>
> I have a general impression that democracy should sometimes be a
> little helped by a strong opinion, when it minimizes damage. If you
> foresee a damage—feel free to undo.
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2015-03-19 11:37 GMT+01:00 Kotya Karapetyan
> <kotya.lists at gmail.com>:
> Dear all,
>
>
> We have enough support to change the current math and
> no dramatic opposition.
> I will do it in the wiki now.
>
>
> FWIW, I didn't even count 8 positive votes that you said would
> be required when cast unanimously, but at least one clear
> opposition (Pieren) plus my comment that you couldn't change
> the rules this way.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
More information about the Tagging
mailing list