[Tagging] Tagging established, unofficial and wild campings

Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com
Wed Mar 25 20:42:55 UTC 2015


I agree that we should not use the star system or six categories It is
becoming far too complex for mappers and renderers. This level of
refinement must be achieved with additional attributes or extra amenities
in a relation.

I really do want to keep *non-designated* as currently proposed. It was my
main reason to start with the proposal. I understand it is not important in
western countries, but it is vital in Africa and the Middle East. It is a
site with the opportunistic blessing and amenity use of a hotel/ hostel,
etc.

Why do we need to keep trekking? Isn't it a special case of unimproved?
Summarized my preference is

   - Designated
   - Unimproved (although I like the word Basic better)
   - Non-designated
   - Wild_camp_site: separate namespace tag for unimproved without blessing


>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150325/62fc854b/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list