[Tagging] RFC - obligatory usage - bicycle=obligatory
voschix at gmail.com
Sat Mar 28 10:31:46 UTC 2015
1) Please no new tag that breaks existing tagging.
2) Please can you give me the missing link in your proposal ("But it
remains disputed (*Insert Link*) whether that obligatory cycleway has to be
mapped as a separate way ...). I am interested in that for a different
purpose which regards the mandatory-ness of the bicycle lanes in Italy
(they are legally cycle-paths with mandatory use).
3) For me it seems that the bicycle
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Duse_sidepath> is the
correct approach, exactly because it is impossible to decide whether a
cycleway is mandatory or not without saying with respect to what road the
requirement is correct.
Let's construct a case: you have two parallel roads. In the middle between
the two there is a cycleway that is labelled with "mandatory". How do you
determine the weighing of the roads for your bicycle routing. Either on the
cycleway the "mandatory" tag has a value that defines which of the roads
are affected, or the roads themselves are labelled with
"bicycle:use_sidepath=yes/no" (note that this is slightly different from
bicycle=use_sidepath, but this is less important)
On 27 March 2015 at 23:56, Hubert <sg.forum at gmx.de> wrote:
> Hallo fellow mappers and bicycle enthusiasts,
> I have created a proposal to tag obligatory roadside cycle ways with
> The proposals is in its early stages right now, but I would like to get
> your ideas and comments already.
> This value can be interpreted as an counterpart to bicycle=use_sidepath.
> As this tag would replace bicycle=designated in a quite a few cases, I am
> hoping for a lot of support from the community.
> Happy mapping
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging