[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Power utility office

[Marc Gemis]

Would you still use building=civic for power utility offices when it's a
commercial company ? The power distribution in Belgium is complex. The
network is ran/owned by a government institution, the actual power
distribution by commercial providers. So when you want a contract to get
electricity you go to a commercial entity. So building=civic is not
suitable there (I think)


regards

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:42 AM, johnw <johnw at mac.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Nov 3, 2015, at 7:38 AM, Joan <aseques at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The tag has already been used a few times (there was four tags in
> different places of the world) see it here
> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/office=power_utility#overview,
> Its counterpart, the water_utility has 35 ocurrences in the map
> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/office=water_utility#overview
>
> 2015-10-24 0:22 GMT+02:00 Joan <aseques at gmail.com>:
>
>> This is a proposal for tagging power utility offices,
>>
>
> I wanted a landuse=civic (or similar) to go with building=civic - and have
> a civic=* subkey to define all the various governmental and civic offices.
> (townhalls, community centeres, tax offices, water district offices, etc.
>
> I would like to actually have something more umbrellaish than doing these
> one office at a time and coming up and doing voting for each one. we need
> each one, so lets make a subkey and define them all. the different utilitiy
> offices (which are usually state run, or state sanctioned monopolies for
> basic services) can easily be added.
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landuse%3Dcivic
>
> Javbw
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20151104/9eade8b5/attachment.html>