[Tagging] Voting rules

Hakuch hakuch at posteo.de
Tue Feb 23 10:51:30 UTC 2016


ok I don't have a neutral opinion on this proposal, but I think
especially here, if you want to change 20.000 tagged objects, it should
be three quarters.


On 23.02.2016 11:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> I feel voting count is broken for some time. Has there been a formal
> proceduce to change the way we count the votes? How was this procedure
> introduced?
> 
> Example, the current jeweller voting:
> Voting closed
> Voting on this proposal has been closed.
> It was provisionally rejected with 40 votes for, 18 votes against and 4
> abstentions.
> Approval rate: 68.97%. Less than required 74% so provisional rejection;
> proposer to make final call.
> 
> 
> Shall we really require three quarters approvement for a vote to pass? Even
> to change the constitution, in many countries you do not need more approval
> than two thirds.
> 
> Cheers,
> Martin
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0x3CBE432B.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 3187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20160223/e0f9bdfb/attachment.key>


More information about the Tagging mailing list