[Tagging] Hunting area tagging

Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com
Mon Oct 24 11:29:21 UTC 2016


On 24-Oct-16 07:54 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> 2016-10-23 11:48 GMT+02:00 Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com 
> <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>>:
>
>     And reiterate your words " in case of a dedicated area" and
>     mine "For an area dedicated to the hunting of game then landuse=hunting" ..
>     I think that is fairly clear ... dedicated, primary use is hunting.
>
>     Most 'landuse' have more than one function, but the primary use is tagged.
>
>     If the primary use is forest then it could be tagged landuse=forest with a secondary tag of hunting=* as you have put forward.
>     If the primary use is hunting then landuse=hunting should be used.
>
>
>
> who is declaring the "primary use"?
The mapper - as usual.
> How would you judge this?
Same as I would judge anything else - from the available evidence.
> landuse=forest is the only widely accepted way to tag an area where 
> trees grow (besides mapping single trees, and besides the 
> landcover=trees property which I myself try to push and besides the 
> natural=wood tag which is disputed in meaning because of the unclear 
> term "natural"), i.e. if you decided that a forest was meant 
> "primarily for hunting", you couldn't map it as a forest...

I would use the following combination;

landuse=hunting
landcover=trees
natural=wood (I too don't 'like' this and for that reason I tend to dual 
tag with the landcover=trees tag. However natural=wood is 'widely 
accepted', just not by some)

If the area were primarily used for the production of tees and/or their 
products with hunting as another use I would use the following combination;

landuse=forest
hunting=yes (or permissive etc)

-------------------
To me landuse=forest is only for areas where trees are grown for the 
production of products from those trees e.g. lumber, wood pulp, oils, 
rubber, maple syrup


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20161024/94b29f2a/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list