[Tagging] cave_entrance. ref and name

Janko Mihelić janjko at gmail.com
Wed Sep 7 10:30:45 UTC 2016

I would add in the wiki that if the tag cave:name=* is absent, name=* can
be considered to be the name of the cave and the entrance. That way we are
consistent with the way the name tag was used until now.


sri, 7. ruj 2016. u 12:25 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
napisao je:

> 2016-09-07 12:08 GMT+02:00 Richard <ricoz.osm at gmail.com>:
>> 16477 of natural=cave_entrance + name out there. Redefining the meaning of
>> name at this point might not be a good idea.
> it is at the most a "re-redefining" because originally on the cave
> entrance page there was no mention of "name" referring to a different
> object than the one that is tagged. It would also be completely confusing
> to make such a definition and it would be in contradiction to the
> definition of the tag "name".
> For practical reasons, I don't think it will create problems as the name
> of the cave can very often also be considered the name of the cave entrance.
> Cheers,
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20160907/390f01f0/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list