[Tagging] Best tagging practices for winery "tasting rooms"

Jack Burke burkejf3 at gmail.com
Thu Sep 8 15:33:25 UTC 2016


In that case, I should probably also include:

beer=no
liquor=no

Would "tourism=wine_tasting" be inappropriate?  It just seems to me that
"tourism=attraction" is too generic.

--jack



Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 17:17:44 +0200
> From: Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
>         <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Best tagging practices for winery "tasting
>         rooms"
> Message-ID: <03D36395-0D20-4E58-B4C4-5F88A6F64444 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset=us-ascii
>
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > Il giorno 05 set 2016, alle ore 16:41, Jack Burke <burkejf3 at gmail.com>
> ha scritto:
> >
> > amenity=bar (sometimes with ;restaurant  added on)
> > wine=yes
> > tourism=attraction
>
>
> if you are specifically after tasting rooms/service, this tagging is way
> too generic. You could add something like wine_tasting=yes/some detail you
> care about
>
> cheers,
> Martin
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20160908/ee60e491/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list