[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Carport
Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Tue Feb 7 16:55:29 UTC 2017
2017-02-07 15:32 GMT+01:00 markus schnalke <meillo at marmaro.de>:
> building=residential and building=house have the same tagging
> structure although one is the super class of the other.
>
yes, they are both describing a building typology, but on different detail
level. We have a very flat hierarchy in the building namespace. Not really
a problem, I'd suggest to prefer more specific terms over more generic
ones, because you can always deduct more generic classes from the specific
types (although admittedly it requires a lot of work to do so, until we are
starting to document all these types).
> It would
> be the same case for building=roof and building=carport. We don't
> tag building=residential + residential=house
>
+1, building=carport is ok IMHO in the building tag tradition, it's the
same specificity as building=garage.
Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20170207/72935579/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list