[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Power pole extension
miketho16 at gmail.com
Sun Feb 12 23:41:20 UTC 2017
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 13-Feb-17 10:25 AM, Tristan Anderson wrote:
> If two-phase power isn't currently in use anywhere, it simply means we
> won't see any instances of the tag phases=2, just like how we'll never see
> phases=17. It doesn't make anything fundamentally wrong with the tagging
> scheme. I believe this is a good proposal that should be voted on.
> There will need to be very careful wording of phases=2 to avoid American
> mappers misusing this tag for 240v split single phase.
That is my concern. This is a typical mistake.
> I think there will be instances of phase=2 occurring in the USA, possibly
> many instances.
Do you mean instances of the tag phase=2, or actual two phase power?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging