[Tagging] Combined use of addr:place and addr:street

Tobias Wrede list at tobias-wrede.de
Fri Jul 14 12:59:02 UTC 2017

Am 14.07.2017 um 14:32 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
> 2017-07-14 10:16 GMT+02:00 Tobias Wrede <list at tobias-wrede.de 
> <mailto:list at tobias-wrede.de>>:
>     Have a look at this place "Siesel":
>     http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/51.22209/7.90369
>     <http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/51.22209/7.90369>. The
>     hamlet is called Siesel and officially all the streets there do
>     not have a name (you can check on the "NRW-Atlas: ALKIS" layer 
>     that all streets are just designated "Weg" i. e. "Street"). From
>     an official address point of view all houses there should have
>     addr:place=Siesel and addr:housenumber=nn.
> is "nn" meant to be literally the string "nn"? (btw: NN in German 
> usage is a placeholder referring to people). In Italy, quite 
> frequently in the countryside, there is the abbreviation "snc" to say 
> "no housenumber", but I wouldn't add this in addr:housenumber as it's 
> not a housenumber (you can find it in official lists in the 
> housenumber field though).
Na. "nn" is meant to be a placeholder for the actual number: 12, 13, 14 
>     On the ground, tough, they have put up the usual German street
>     name signs all showing "Siesel". So from an on the ground point of
>     view all houses there should have addr:street=Siesel and
>     addr:housenumber=nn. What to do now?
>  it's by definition we refuse to have both tags, as addr:place is 
> defined for places without streetnames
Well that's the question here, isn't it? Is it by definition or not?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20170714/be95d648/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list