[Tagging] simple 3D buildings, proposed redefinition of building:levels and building:min_level for building:part

Michael Reichert nakaner at gmx.net
Thu Mar 9 18:52:33 UTC 2017


Hi Martin,

Am 09.03.2017 um 19:39 schrieb Tobias Knerr:
> Your proposed change would, therefore, make data mapped using these keys
> mostly useless due to the unresolvable ambiguity. In my opinion, that
> kind of cost is not worth it.

I oppose the proposed change for exactly the same reasons. Redefinitions
like this just cause confusion amongst mappers and data users. As a
consequence, mappers will focus on other topics than 3D mapping. Is that
your goal? I hope not.

Best regards

Michael

-- 
Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschl├╝sselt. (Mailinglisten
ausgenommen)
I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20170309/47ca9f40/attachment.sig>


More information about the Tagging mailing list