[Tagging] Landuse for vacant lots

Greg Troxel gdt at lexort.com
Mon Mar 13 12:40:28 UTC 2017


I favor "landuse=disused".
That implies that there was previous significant human use, and now
there is no real use.

As to "if no use, no tag", the point is that there is a difference
between knowing that an area is essentially abandoned, vs it being
forested or meadow or whatever and being left as it is, which is quite
different.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 162 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20170313/8c74daf6/attachment.sig>


More information about the Tagging mailing list