[Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - (office=courier)"

Marc Gemis marc.gemis at gmail.com
Tue May 16 08:27:06 UTC 2017


On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
<dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
> For shops that offer courier services as a minor part / not primarily, it should be a property for the shop, maybe with the carrier in the key, e.g. amenity=fuel, courier:UPS=yes?

Maybe it's a silly idea, but why do not we map this as 2 nodes  ? This
way, we do not have to come up with 2 sets of keys (one for
amenity=courier and one on anything else).
Both nodes could be connected via a "shop"-relation or whatever you
want to name it.

m



More information about the Tagging mailing list