[Tagging] Flood mark or high water mark

Yves yvecai at mailbox.org
Sun Aug 5 14:45:47 UTC 2018

Spotted thanks to Osmand:

Le 5 août 2018 12:23:40 GMT+02:00, Volker Schmidt <voschix at gmail.com> a écrit :
>Flood marks and high water marks are not necessarily the same thing.
>to get the gist.
>There are ordinary high water marks (and I suppose also the opposite,
>ordinary low water marks) which are based on the regular tides in the
>A flood mark would be a marker for the water level reached in certain,
>particular events.
>I am not sure about terminology in different jurisdictions, but the
>seems to be clear to me that there are two different things we want to
>On 5 August 2018 at 11:46, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
>> sent from a phone
>> > On 3. Aug 2018, at 18:03, Robert Szczepanek <robert at szczepanek.pl>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Indeed not all flood marks are really old/historic. But that
>> is probably very fuzzy.
>> I would put it like this: although they are not all old, they are all
>> history related (they show a historic flood level)
>> Cheers , Martin
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180805/6246a4ef/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list