[Tagging] Fwd: Missing access value (access=license / authorization?)

[Szem]

2018.08.13. 20:32 keltezéssel, Szem írta:
> Tags in summary:
> - Roads found in Waterworks area:
> access=private, bicycle=permit, foot=permit, horse=no
>
> -Roads on the embankments:
> access= private, motor_vehicle=permit, foot=yes, horse=yes, bicycle=yes,
access=permit, foot=yes, horse=yes, bicycle=yes
?
>
> - Roads in wildlife conservation areas:
> access= private, motor_vehicle=permit, bicycle=permit, foot=yes
access=permit, foot=yes
?
>
>
> OK?
>
> Counter:
> In the page of 
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/access%3Dpermit  
> the small counter counts only "access=permit" tag, but these roads 
> doesn't have this tag.
> Can be converted it to "*=permit" or sg like this? If I change all the 
> roads, it will not look.
>
> Wiki:
> When I mentioned the wiki, I meant this page below it:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access  -  Access tag values
> Can not you put this access value there?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Szem
>
> 2018.08.12. 23:30 keltezéssel, Graeme Fitzpatrick írta:
>> On 13 August 2018 at 06:50, Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny+osm at gmail.com 
>> <mailto:kevin.b.kenny+osm at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>     On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 9:48 AM Szem <szembiketeam at gmail.com
>>     <mailto:szembiketeam at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>     > I begun to use the "permit" tag, what is the correct tagging for
>>     these categories?
>>     >
>>     > - Roads found in Waterworks area (You could get permit only for
>>     biking and walking, no cars except for their own ones)
>>     > access=private, motor_vehicle / vehicle = private ?
>>     bicycle=permit, foot=permit, horse=no
>>
>>     Sounds right; no need to tag motor_vehicle separately, since 'access'
>>     covers all transportation modes that aren't called out separately.
>>
>>     > - Roads on the embankments (By any motor vehicle without
>>     permission is forbidden, except for their own ones, other access
>>     is free)
>>     > access= private, motor_vehicle / vehicle =permit ? foot=yes,
>>     horse=yes, bicycle=yes,
>>
>>     If permission is readily obtainable, then 'permit'. If permission
>>     happens on a case-by-case basis, 'private' is probably closer.
>>
>>
>> In cases when only official vehicles (National Parks, Water supply 
>> etc) are allowed, I've always called that vehicles=no, working on 
>> "/no/ – No access for the general public."?
>>
>>     > - Roads managed by Hunting Association, wildlife conservation
>>     areas (Crossing by any vehicle without permission is forbidden,
>>     except for their own ones):
>>     > access= private, motor_vehicle / vehicle = permit, foot=yes,
>>     horse=permit, bicycle= permit
>>
>>     Once again, if it's "access granted if you comply with the
>>     formalities", then 'permit', otherwise 'private'.  The Hunting
>>     Association one sounds as if it restricts access to its own members?
>>     In that case, it's definitely "private."
>>
>>
>> & yes, I'd agree that Members only is "private"
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Graeme
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180813/3d5ae126/attachment.html>