[Tagging] Fwd: Missing access value (access=license / authorization?)

Javier Sánchez Portero javiersanp at gmail.com
Tue Aug 14 09:37:43 UTC 2018


Hello Szem

No. That way is just the opposite of the intended meaning. It says that
every body need a permit (for example cars) and hikers and riders can
access freely. The previous one was ok. Access=no (or private as someones
suggest) + transportmode=permit

El lun., 13 ago. 2018 20:54, Szem <szembiketeam at gmail.com> escribió:

> access=permit, foot=yes, horse=yes, bicycle=yes
> ?
>
>
> - Roads in wildlife conservation areas:
> access= private, motor_vehicle=permit, bicycle=permit, foot=yes
>
> access=permit, foot=yes
> ?
>
>
>
> OK?
>
> Counter:
> In the page of
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/access%3Dpermit
> the small counter counts only "access=permit" tag, but these roads
> doesn't have this tag.
> Can be converted it to "*=permit" or sg like this? If I change all the
> roads, it will not look.
>
> Wiki:
> When I mentioned the wiki, I meant this page below it:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access  -  Access tag values
> Can not you put this access value there?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Szem
>
> 2018.08.12. 23:30 keltezéssel, Graeme Fitzpatrick írta:
>
> On 13 August 2018 at 06:50, Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny+osm at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 9:48 AM Szem <szembiketeam at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I begun to use the "permit" tag, what is the correct tagging for these
>> categories?
>> >
>> > - Roads found in Waterworks area (You could get permit only for biking
>> and walking, no cars except for their own ones)
>> > access=private, motor_vehicle / vehicle = private ? bicycle=permit,
>> foot=permit, horse=no
>>
>> Sounds right; no need to tag motor_vehicle separately, since 'access'
>> covers all transportation modes that aren't called out separately.
>>
>> > - Roads on the embankments (By any motor vehicle without permission is
>> forbidden, except for their own ones, other access is free)
>> > access= private, motor_vehicle / vehicle =permit ? foot=yes, horse=yes,
>> bicycle=yes,
>>
>> If permission is readily obtainable, then 'permit'. If permission
>> happens on a case-by-case basis, 'private' is probably closer.
>>
>
> In cases when only official vehicles (National Parks, Water supply etc)
> are allowed, I've always called that vehicles=no, working on " *no* – No
> access for the general public."?
>
> > - Roads managed by Hunting Association, wildlife conservation areas
>> (Crossing by any vehicle without permission is forbidden, except for their
>> own ones):
>> > access= private, motor_vehicle / vehicle = permit, foot=yes,
>> horse=permit, bicycle= permit
>>
>> Once again, if it's "access granted if you comply with the
>> formalities", then 'permit', otherwise 'private'.  The Hunting
>> Association one sounds as if it restricts access to its own members?
>> In that case, it's definitely "private."
>
>
> & yes, I'd agree that Members only is "private"
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing listTagging at openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180814/2c163a82/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list