[Tagging] Fwd: Missing access value (access=license / authorization?)

[Warin]

Some examples might help?

If tagged
access=no

with no following access tags then it means

no one has access.

If tagged
access=no

with the following access tag

foot=permit

then it means

no one has access,
except
if on foot .. then they have to have a permit to have access.

If tagged
access=no

with the following access tags

bicycle=yes
horse=yes

then it means

no one has access,
except
if  by bicycle or horse .. then they have access.


On 14/08/18 19:37, Javier Sánchez Portero wrote:
> Hello Szem
>
> No. That way is just the opposite of the intended meaning. It says 
> that every body need a permit (for example cars) and hikers and riders 
> can access freely. The previous one was ok. Access=no (or private as 
> someones suggest) + transportmode=permit
>
> El lun., 13 ago. 2018 20:54, Szem <szembiketeam at gmail.com 
> <mailto:szembiketeam at gmail.com>> escribió:
>
>     access=permit, foot=yes, horse=yes, bicycle=yes
>     ?
>>
>>     - Roads in wildlife conservation areas:
>>     access= private, motor_vehicle=permit, bicycle=permit, foot=yes
>     access=permit, foot=yes
>     ?
>>
>>
>>     OK?
>>
>>     Counter:
>>     In the page of
>>     https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/access%3Dpermit
>>     the small counter counts only "access=permit" tag, but these
>>     roads doesn't have this tag.
>>     Can be converted it to "*=permit" or sg like this? If I change
>>     all the roads, it will not look.
>>
>>     Wiki:
>>     When I mentioned the wiki, I meant this page below it:
>>     https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access -  Access tag values
>>     Can not you put this access value there?
>>
>>     Thanks,
>>
>>     Szem
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180814/ea73eb2e/attachment.html>