[Tagging] tagging of one-way cycle lanes

Marc Gemis marc.gemis at gmail.com
Sat May 12 20:01:40 UTC 2018


So far 2 people keep insisting that cycle lanes are counted and a
larger number says no. AFAIK a non-OSM person will not count cycle
lanes when asked to tell how many lanes a road has.
I asked around on the Belgian OSM Riot Channel and immediately got 3
responses, to NOT count cycle lanes.

So please follow the wiki, create your own tag to include cycle lanes
and hope that it will get traction.

Why do you keep mistagging roads if you know the wiki tells you not to
count cycle lanes? I see this as deliberate vandalism.

I understand that you do not agree with the current definition,
however I do not understand why you insist on putting an incorrect
value in that tag.
We have a free tagging schema, so it is easy to create a new tag for
your purpose.

regards

m.


On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 9:19 PM, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Steve Doerr <doerr.stephen at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On 12/05/2018 12:04, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>>
>>> Actually, while I know about and abide to the wiki definition, I don't
>>> think it is intuitive to count some lanes and other not.
>>
>>
>> We do that because of a UN convention:
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2011-September/008578.html
>
>
> Sure, and that was a pretty motorist-oriented convention, unsurprising since
> its inception was in 1968.  There's plenty of Vienna Convention countries
> that have bicycle lanes now and even marked out lanes on ways only open to
> bicycles, an increasing number of which have multiple bike lanes on the same
> roadway in the same direction.  So I'm pretty sure the idea has evolved a
> bit in the intervening half century.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>



More information about the Tagging mailing list