[Tagging] tagging of one-way cycle lanes

[Paul Johnson]

On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Why do you keep taggig roads if you know the wiki tells you not to
> count cycle lanes?


The wiki doesn't mesh with the real world on this issue.

How is this lanes=0 and not lanes=2?

https://imgur.com/gallery/3C3lHbj

How is this lanes=2 and not lanes=4?

http://www.oregonlive.com/cycling/index.ssf/2013/10/hawthorne_bridge_gets_new_bike.html

What now?

https://nacto.org/wp-content/uploads/gallery/bicycleboulevard_offsetcrossing_rendering/offset_crossings3.jpg

I'm sure this fits the wiki's idea of the world and doesn't give cyclists
bad lane advice at all.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/a3/76/c2/a376c2693250554476060fc87b00be9f.jpg

All involved would probably appreciate advanced warning of this example of
what's on the ground being stupid.

https://systemicfailure.wordpress.com/2016/09/28/dangerous-double-right-turn-in-fremont/

It's not just the US doing stuff like this.

https://tinlizzieridesagain.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/100_8603.jpg

Christchurch, NZ actually suggests this:

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-SPHHygdFnRA/UwCbqrLXfoI/AAAAAAAARMA/yPT4ic1zTqw/s1600/christchurchmadjunction.jpg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180512/e1cca722/attachment.html>