[Tagging] tagging of one-way cycle lanes

Marc Gemis marc.gemis at gmail.com
Sat May 12 21:34:41 UTC 2018


For your first image lanes=0, lanes:forward=2, lanes:backward=1. Awkward
but correct.  But as said before,  the lanes tag is pretty useless beside
some simple,  straightforward street layouts,  for even number of total
lanes evenly divided in both directions.  Lanes=3 is useless,  not?

So once again,  define a new tag or do not use the lanes tag,  or use it as
it is defined now.  Do not change its meaning.

Op za 12 mei 2018 23:16 schreef Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org>:

> On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Why do you keep taggig roads if you know the wiki tells you not to
>> count cycle lanes?
>
>
> The wiki doesn't mesh with the real world on this issue.
>
> How is this lanes=0 and not lanes=2?
>
> https://imgur.com/gallery/3C3lHbj
>
> How is this lanes=2 and not lanes=4?
>
>
> http://www.oregonlive.com/cycling/index.ssf/2013/10/hawthorne_bridge_gets_new_bike.html
>
> What now?
>
>
> https://nacto.org/wp-content/uploads/gallery/bicycleboulevard_offsetcrossing_rendering/offset_crossings3.jpg
>
> I'm sure this fits the wiki's idea of the world and doesn't give cyclists
> bad lane advice at all.
>
>
> https://i.pinimg.com/originals/a3/76/c2/a376c2693250554476060fc87b00be9f.jpg
>
> All involved would probably appreciate advanced warning of this example of
> what's on the ground being stupid.
>
>
> https://systemicfailure.wordpress.com/2016/09/28/dangerous-double-right-turn-in-fremont/
>
> It's not just the US doing stuff like this.
>
> https://tinlizzieridesagain.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/100_8603.jpg
>
> Christchurch, NZ actually suggests this:
>
>
> http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-SPHHygdFnRA/UwCbqrLXfoI/AAAAAAAARMA/yPT4ic1zTqw/s1600/christchurchmadjunction.jpg
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180512/78f7cb51/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list