[Tagging] roundtrip

Peter Elderson pelderson at gmail.com
Fri May 25 10:20:33 UTC 2018

In that case it is a service-thing rather than a route-thing. Is it
generally used like that?
The wiki just mentions the co-location of start/endpoint of the route.

The suggested use as a validator-tag requires the use exactlly as the wiki
says, while other suggested uses mark cases where the tag differs from the
location-based definition.

I see a consistency problem here... which explains why the actual use of
this tag is also inconsistent.

2018-05-25 11:58 GMT+02:00 Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com>:

> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 6:48 AM, Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> The only use case I can imagine is when a roundtrip has one ore more
>> access ways which are included in the route relation. But even then, what
>> is the purpose?
> I would say that roundtrip=yes on route A->B->A means that you can remain
> on the bus at B and roundtrip=no means
> that you are (officially) required to disembark.  I mention "officially"
> because some drivers may permit some passengers
> to remain on the bus.  If you are required to disembark at B, even if you
> do not have to buy another ticket when you
> get back on board, it's roundtrip=no.  It's not a matter of duration of
> the stop at B, it's whether or not you can start at
> A and return to A without leaving the bus.
> --
> Paul
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Vr gr Peter Elderson
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180525/3d07dd7e/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list