[Tagging] Estimated values for height

[Sergio Manzi]

Please, just forget about trees (/and the fact that they obviously grow.../): trees have only been the "/casus belli/", the case for which we asked ourselves how "Estimated values for height" (/the topic of this thread.../) should be tagged.

The real question, I think, is if it is correct to have all those est_* keys or there could be a better way to indicate the accuracy of a measure.

Cheers,

Sergio


On 2018-11-12 11:01, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> I believe there is way too much fuzz about this, almost every number in OSM is estimated, the height of a tree cannot be measured to the mm even with the most precise instruments (and even if you could, it would be outdated within the same day). Just add the height.
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20181112/4a5e720d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3675 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20181112/4a5e720d/attachment.bin>