[Tagging] Estimated values for height

Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com
Mon Nov 12 10:30:49 UTC 2018


On 12/11/18 21:23, Sergio Manzi wrote:
>
> Please, just forget about trees (/and the fact that they obviously 
> grow.../): trees have only been the "/casus belli/", the case for 
> which we asked ourselves how "Estimated values for height" (/the topic 
> of this thread.../) should be tagged.
>
> The real question, I think, is if it is correct to have all those 
> est_* keys or there could be a better way to indicate the accuracy of 
> a measure.
>

I think the only people who are going to see those indications of 
accuracy are other mappers.
In which case .. why not use a note, a comment ...human to human.
There is no need to complicate it with rigid computer organised tags.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20181112/0478168f/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list