[Tagging] Suggestion: ref:mobile_payment for amenity=parking

Sergio Manzi smz at smz.it
Thu Nov 29 20:44:35 UTC 2018

+1 You're my hero!

To clarify: my contribution was about making right (/according to my point of view, of course/!) something that I thought had issues, but in a general way I'm totally with you and I'm finding a little bit crazy the level of details that someone want to use in the description of OSM features, some of which, I think, should have very little to do with OSM (/I'm thinking of the //meticoulous description/mapping of //infrastructures of less than general interest. As I said elswere: should we map railroad ties too?/).



On 2018-11-29 21:29, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 02:19, Sergio Manzi <smz at smz.it <mailto:smz at smz.it>> wrote:
>     Right! Too many payments! :-) To spare some bytes it could be: payment:sms:ExampleApp:code=<code to send>.  What do you think?
> I would think that it shouldn't be up to OSM to list all the ways someone can pay for parking, down to which app to use or phone number to call / SMS.
> OSM should say that "this" area is paid parking & leave it at that - once the driver parks their car, they walk over to the payment terminal & all the necessary info is listed there, & updated as needed by the car park operator - their problem, not our's!
> Thanks
> Graeme
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20181129/b959b2d0/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3675 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20181129/b959b2d0/attachment.bin>

More information about the Tagging mailing list