[Tagging] issues with the list of deprecated features

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Mon Oct 15 14:38:24 UTC 2018


Am Mo., 15. Okt. 2018 um 14:21 Uhr schrieb Tom Pfeifer <
t.pfeifer at computer.org>:

> On 15.10.2018 10:57, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> > 3. amenity=creche and amenity=nursery
> > For both tags amenity=kindergarten is suggested as alternative tagging,
> which seems clearly wrong
> > (kindergarten is usually for ages 3-6 while these tags are for ages
> 0-3).
>
> I thought the consensus was here that it depends on the country. In
> Germany, I see mostly the "Kita"
> (Kindertagesst├Ątte) structure which in the same institution enrols age 0-6
> in different departments
> or groups, and a lot offer afterschool supervision (Hort).
> This is easily expressed with the min_age + max_age tag, and some folks
> use after_school=yes.



For the German situation, KiTa and Hort should/could well be tagged with
childcare, but "Krippe"? And if we decide to tag a Krippe (creche/nursery)
the same as a Hort or KiTa, but with age tags, isn't that inconsistent with
Kindergarten? From my point of view, Hort and KiTa are both childcare
places which extend beyond the times of kindergarten and school (and are
after those, typically), while a Krippe is for babies up to 3 years and is
more like a Kindergarten, apart from the age. It would really be much more
logical and easier to introduce / accept nurseries (there's a reason there
is a specific term for this in language, no?), then throw most but not all
of "child-related-stuff" in the same cauldron where you will have to dig
for age group and other specfic tags in order to make sense of it.

Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20181015/0f66caa5/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list